Justice Collins said that eight of the victims opposed name suppression.
"They cite amongst other reasons the inappropriateness of him obtaining permanent name suppression when he violated their dignity and privacy."
Two of Wilson's victims did not oppose his continued name suppression.
"The victim impact statements explain how many of the women have suffered stress and anxiety over Dr Wilson's behaviour," Justice Collins said.
"The victims have said how they felt dehumanised and angry over the breach of trust inherent in Dr Wilson's offending."
Justice Collins dismissed each of the five grounds of appeal advanced on behalf of Wilson.
Wilson was formerly a cardiologist at Nelson Hospital but is no longer working as a doctor. Photo / via Facebook
"While accepting that naming the doctor would inevitably cause distress for his family, this fell well short of the threshold of extreme hardship set out in s 200 (2) (a) of the [Criminal Procedure] Act."
Justice Collins also found a discretionary factor which weighed heavily against the continued suppression of Wilson's name was that it would unfairly cast a cloud of suspicion over many "Nelson health professionals".