Speaker of the House Trevor Mallard issued a public apology to a former staffer. Photo / File
Speaker of the House Trevor Mallard issued a public apology to a former staffer. Photo / File
A former attorney-general says Trevor Mallard's reign as Speaker is safe, despite revelations his false "rape" claim cost taxpayers more than $333,000 to resolve. But he says Mallard should be footing his own legal bill, not the public.
Mallard issued a personal apology this week to a former staffer hefalsely accused of being a rapist.
He issued the statement the same afternoon of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into the Christchurch terror attacks, prompting claims he was trying bury his apology on a busy news day.
It was later revealed the saga had cost taxpayers $333,000 in an ex-gratia payment and legal fees.
National leader Judith Collins said the party has lost confidence in Mallard.
"This is unacceptable behaviour from the Speaker of the House. This sheer size of this payout illustrates how serious the matter is.
"Because Mr Mallard has not lived up to the high standards of behaviour that he has set for Parliament, we believe he is no longer fit to hold the role of Speaker."
Former attorney-general and former National Party MP Chris Finlayson told Newstalk ZB Mallard would continue as Speaker, despite the payout, because Labour holds a majority in the house.
When pressed on whether he had confidence in Mallard's role as Speaker, Finlayson said: "It's a bit of a non-issue because he is going to continue as speaker."
Finlayson said any vote of no confidence would be "ritualistic rubbish" that would go nowhere.
However, he had "an objection" to MPs being indemnified for defamation suits.
"I think this has all hallmarks of a bit of a mess. If they open their big mouths and they're sued they should pick up the tab themselves.
Chris Finlayson standing outside Parliament. Photo / File
"Very occasionally there will be those who set out through litigation to impose huge financial costs on a Member of Parliament but that's a very exceptional circumstance.
"Generally I don't see why MPs as a class should be immune from the consequences of opening their traps."
Finlayson said he'd had "issues" with Mallard over the years.
"But I think in fairness he's trying to be Parliament's man and he's raised standards of question time because a lot of people are far too lax in the questions they asked.
"If they get a bit of a kick in the pants from him that's no bad thing."
In terms of long-term repercussions, Finlayson said the situation would most likely be subsumed by the other political events.
"I'd say it's got a few days' life left in it and then it will fizz. I don't think it will drift on for too long."
In June last year, Mallard said he believed a rapist was working in the parliamentary precinct.
It was the day after the Francis report, which reviewed the parliamentary workplace, was released.
The report found systemic issues of bullying and harassment, poor conduct too often tolerated and normalised, and a perception of low accountability.
Mallard himself commissioned the report after a series of cases of bad behaviour.
Mallard had said that he believed a man was responsible for three serious sexual assaults mentioned in the review, and that he believed the man was still working at Parliament.
