Russell's role was to oversee the trust's asset position, and make decisions, based on advice from Five Star managing director Nicholas Kirk, to make investment decisions. Kirk was left to deal with administrative matters, but wasn't granted the right to make trust decisions.
The Five Star group of companies called in receivers in 2007. The Five Star Finance entity owes creditors some $43.8 million, of which only $551,000 has been recovered.
"It is common ground that the person responsible for moving funds between the company and the trust was Mr Kirk," the judgement said. "At all times he was both managing director of the company and the agent responsible for administration of the trust."
Because the decisions made by Kirk weren't within the mandate granted by Russell, the judge accepted the submission that Kirk had not authority to transfer trust funds into Five Star Finance, and that his actions couldn't be attributable to Russell.
"Mr Russell might owe a duty of care to the beneficiaries to ensure that trust assets are not dissipated by trust agents, but that is a different question from the scope of authority given to Mr Kirk and the extent to which Mr Kirk's conduct can be attributed to Mr Russell," Bell said.
The collapse of the Five Star group attracted a Serious Fraud Office investigation, and the white-collar crime unit subsequently laid charges against four former and a so-called 'de facto' director in 2010. Three of them pleaded guilty, while the final two are expected to defend the charges in June this year.