Because of the level of the boy's mother's concern, she ensured her son's Facebook profile had blocked Douglas so he could not make contact. But Douglas created a pseudo Facebook name and managed to contact the boy through the new profile.
The boy was aware of the defendant's identity, despite the false details, and willingly began to engage in conversation with him, the summary said. Early last June, Douglas used Facebook to arrange to meet the boy so they could have sex, which they did between June 7 and 9 behind the garage at the boy's home.
Between July 1 and 31, they again arranged to meet for sex, meeting at a park. When the two mothers found the defendant's new profile they again blocked Douglas.
They did not know physical meetings had been taking place. Douglas then changed his Facebook profile again. But on August 30, the boy's mother became suspicious about who her son was communicating with and she remotely monitored the Facebook conversation.
She identified Douglas and immediately went to his address and confronted him.
Crown and defence counsel agreed the offending had clearly had a significant effect on the victim and his family.