He has continued to maintain his innocence, and gave his age, of 68 at the time, and "serious health issues" as reasons for seeking bail, as well as the lengthy wait for an Appeal Court hearing.
But his bail application was dismissed. There was no suggestion Chambers' health had deteriorated since sentencing or any evidence that his health needs were not being met in prison, said last year's ruling.
This month, the Court of Appeal granted Chambers an extension of time to appeal but it dismissed his appeal against his conviction and sentence.
Through his lawyer, Chambers alleged he had been subjected to prejudice at his trial and that his sentencing was excessive.
In his ruling, Justice Wild said Chambers had not suffered prejudice during his trial and that the sentence handed down was "entirely appropriate".
"What [Chambers' lawyer's] submission overlooks is that the judge was sentencing Mr Chambers for eight indecent assaults on six different boys.
"Indeed, we view it as a lenient and merciful sentence. In no way was it inappropriate or manifestly excessive," said Justice Wild.