For all the popular angst about foreign ownership of New Zealand business, it is sobering to read only 36 per cent of companies listed on the NZX last year were foreign-owned, compared with 46 per cent of the Australian stock exchange at the same time. But this is no cause
Editorial: Xero's delisting depletes confidence in exchange
Subscribe to listen
It is cold comfort for the New Zealand exchange that he gave it a parting tribute as a launch pad for new tech companies. "We have seen other companies struggle by skipping the NZX, arriving in Australia and just not being noticed." If it is to continue providing a source of capital for new ventures, the local exchange needs the loyalty of those it has nurtured as well as listings from foreign companies with subsidiaries here.
The exchange is having a particularly bad year with just one new listing, and chief executive Mark Peterson is worried others will follow Xero. Not hiding his disappointment, he said: "They have had a fantastic run with us. There were other ways to achieve what we think their objectives are. We have companies on our market that are also on the ASX100 and ASX200."
Fund manager Brian Gaynor reported in his Weekend Herald column that Xero told analysts last week a major reason for its delisting was the reluctance of many global fund managers to trade through the NZX because of the low level of on-market trading and poor transparency. Only 35 per cent of NZX trades by value were done through the electronic market, compared with 66 per cent of ASX trades. The higher proportion of off-market trading the higher the risk of mispricing.
New Zealand needs the NZX to lift its game and the NZX needs a protege like Xero to stay true to its roots.