When the Government passed the Rugby World Cup 2011 (Empowering) Act, it clearly signalled its intentions. It was saying, in effect, that it was determined absolutely nothing would stand in the way of how it wanted the event to be run. Yesterday came the confirmation as the Government used the
Editorial: Four years of World Cup plans unravel in four days
Subscribe to listen
Rugby World Cup minister Murray McCully. Photo / Mark Mitchell
Mr McCully's plan to avoid a repeat involves taking complete control of Party Central and enlarging the fan zones to include the Bledisloe and Captain Cook wharves. Very late in the piece, urgent work will have to be done there to install amenities and guarantee crowd safety. The added wharf space should thin out any crowd that flocks to the area, most likely on Sunday, October 23, if New Zealand wins the World Cup.
This provision comes, however, at a cost to the Ports of Auckland. Both wharves are important in its operations. It is reasonable to ask whether that cost is too high, as a repeat of last Friday's crowd size is unlikely.
Most fundamentally, yesterday's move is a slap in the face for the Super City concept that the Government set up not so long ago. It was the Government that established the framework, including the council- controlled organisations that proved inept in their planning. Now, at the first sign of a bloody nose, it has stepped in to take control.
The Government might also have been tempted to take a similar step over the public transport disruptions, but knows there is nothing it can do to correct Auckland's frail train system in a matter of weeks. Mr McCully has, therefore, confined himself to approving planning in an area of considerable familiarity.
The fact that such last-minute changes are having to be made speaks volumes about the calibre of the previous plans. Huge mistakes were made, not least the failure to organise alternative venues for celebrations when it became obvious the waterfront would be badly overcrowded. Mr McCully says Government officials will write a new plan to manage the waterfront beyond its own fan zone at Queens Wharf. He will not be directly involved, he says.
Nevertheless, his imprint will be all over it. Likewise, he cannot play down the use of such extravagant emergency powers. All too often, last-minute decisions taken in haste and without due regard for proper processes come unstuck. The minister must now prove this is not an overreaction and that he does, indeed, know best.