The plaque itself revises history in that it replaced an inscription which mentioned a purchase and not a gift. The wording was arrived at by the port company which financed the plaque and sought the advice of Ngāti Whātua.
The iwi says Te Kawau's offer amounted to a "sharing of the land."
Campbell's biographer, the historian Russell Stone dismisses the elevation of Te Kawau above Campbell as political correctness. Stone asserts that Campbell's intimate connection with Auckland and lasting influence makes him the pre-eminent candidate.
Perhaps it can be seen that Auckland has more than one father and, who knows, probably mothers as well. Looking back, the record suggests that both Campbell and Te Kawau helped create the foundations of the city.
Their stories are worth retelling. Where is the harm in embracing both?