However, board chairman Doug McKay did not respond to Clark's comments.
"We've issued our statement, there is nothing further to say," he said.
"There's no news here in this matter."
A spokeswoman for Minister for Sport and Recreation Grant Robertson said the Eden Park Trust was an independent organisation responsible for its own decision making.
"Other than appointing five of the nine trustees (as per the Eden Park Trust Act 1955), the Crown has no responsibility for or decision-making power over the Park," she said.
"Moreover, the Crown has no ownership or 'shareholding' interest in the Park."
McKay earlier said the board had been delighted with Sautner's work ethic and integrity.
"There hasn't been a single incident which has given me cause to doubt him and, unless he proves me wrong, Nick Sautner has our full support."
The Federal Court stated in its decision "it should not be overlooked that Mr Sautner's purpose was to treat his unlimited access to tickets as cash, that is as a supplementary form of income.
"Whatever 'for their personal use' meant in the policy, on no reading would that purpose be authorised.
"The 'perk' that staff were being given was not obtaining tickets to use as cash but obtaining tickets so that the staff member, their family, friends and acquaintances could get to attend events at the stadium."
In a statement, Eden Park Trust said the court case was "not new information", and it looked into the issue before hiring Sautner.