“I don’t think they were very interested in what I had to offer, considering I never got past the service desk on the phone,” he said.
He was told in most cases there was “insufficient evidence to take a case” but the council had spoken with 60 individuals over the past year.
“I’m a bit dubious about this statistic in light of what was communicated to me by the Dunedin City Council via phone, and the fact they showed no interest in my information.
“It’s not good enough — it’s poor enforcement culture.”
A council spokesman said since November 2021, the council had received more than 500 reports of illegal rubbish dumping, and about 200 reports of abandoned items on streets and footpaths.
The council had the option of warnings for first-time and minor offences, infringement notices — of up to $400 — or prosecutions for repeat offenders and more significant incidents.
“No infringement notices or prosecutions resulted in the last year,” the spokesman said.
The spokesman said most incidents were small-scale, and the council’s focus was on removing dumped material and educating the public on appropriate rubbish disposal.
In the case of the Flagstaff-Whare Flat Rd incident, a contractor had visited the site and removed the rubbish.
“But there was insufficient evidence to issue an infringement notice or pursue a prosecution,” the spokesman said.
The council apologised for not informing the complainant of the outcome. - ODT