In order to have been successful at the tribunal, which deals with civil disputes between people in an informal court setting, and without lawyers, the woman would have needed to prove that a duty of care had been breached and that the incident was “foreseeable”.
Referee Paulette Goddard said the effects of the cyclone were widely reported at the time and left homeowners and council workers in turmoil.
She said the neighbour had a duty of care to make sure his shed was securely fixed to his property and wouldn’t blow away in the event of a storm.
In his evidence to the tribunal the man said he’d purchased the shed four years earlier and secured it to a timber floor with 75mm screws which exceeded the manufacturer’s specifications.
Ultimately, Goddard found that he’d taken all reasonable steps to ensure his shed was secured properly, and there was nothing he could do about an “act of God”.
“I find there is insufficient evidence that (the man) acted negligently concurrently with the act of God, or that he could have reasonably anticipated, guarded against and foreseen the act of God.”
She dismissed the woman’s claim for almost $5000 in damages.