First, he failed to disclose that an instrument had separated during the root canal treatment.
Secondly, he failed to fully inform the man about the reasons for his re-treatment, the treatment options available to him, and the risks, side effects, benefits and costs of those options, including his skills in the area.
Thirdly, the dentist did not keep proper records of the consultations.
The dentist was referred to the Director of Proceedings for the purpose of deciding whether any proceedings should be taken.
Ms Baker also found the dentist's employer vicariously liable for the dentist's breaches of the code, as it did not have specific written policies in relation to informed consent.