Would it matter if we heard less local fiction on air? Of course it would.
If we lose such content, we start to lose our national voice. I don't mean affected beer-commercial drawls or references to pongas and pukekos; I mean the egalitarian, demotic, subversive viewpoint that's part of the New Zealand identity. Our fiction helps remind us who we are. It's our own lives speaking to us.
It also affirms that those lives are worth writing about. Cutting local fiction would imply there's nothing really special about New Zealanders; that we're just part of a global bland brand.
Good fiction explains things, puts them in context. Julian Barnes puts it perfectly: "Life says this happens. Books say this happens because ... "
Hearing quality New Zealand stories helps us see our lives in terms of pattern and meaning. When you read or listen to fiction, you become part of the story. You help complete it. You're made to feel special. Locally written material makes that "special" immediate and relevant.
Roger Hall, Graeme Lay, Fiona Kidman, Maurice Gee and many other major New Zealand writers started to become known through radio. Getting on air and getting paid for it helped them build writing skills, confidence, a profile to help them keep going. It'll be sad if, in spite of their continued efforts, RNZ aren't able to provide that opportunity for the next generations of our authors.
Up till 1999 in New Zealand, a public broadcasting fee meant that everyone paid a tiny sum towards funding local content on TV and radio. The fee was wiped as an election sweetener. How terrific if any political party this October has enough vertebrae to propose a similar source of funding for our writers. Or maybe that scenario is pure ... fiction.
David Hill is a Taranaki writer.