There will, of course, always be choices in the carve-up of the crime-fighting budget. The findings of our series raise legitimate arguments whether the allocation of police resources is appropriate, given the number of burglaries going unresolved.
Police made the point that the definition of burglary had altered so that many minor offences - the example of a basketball going missing from a lawn was offered - now were included in burglary statistics.
That may be so but the insistent message from burglary victims reacting to our coverage and the impact of offending makes it clear that families whose homes have been burgled often are left feeling helpless, violated and fearful.
It is likely many New Zealanders share this unease, because burglary is big business, both in the scale of offending and cost on the community.
Burglaries make up about 15 per cent of reported crime. The last Treasury estimate, in 2005, of the annual cost to the state of burglaries was $626 million.
Insurance firms pay out a similar amount each year in claims. One criminologist argued the way to reduce burglary was to discourage New Zealanders becoming burglars in the first place, which is laudable but unlikely.
The Minister of Police believes individuals have to play their part by securing their property. Many do of course, but still get burgled. Resisting the temptation to buy goods at "hot" prices would also be a deterrent because burglars do not steal appliances and other goods to keep.
There is another measure which many want to see. In the published 38-page briefing police gave their minister after the last election, the word "burglary" does not appear, though the police declared in the document that victims were "at the centre of our response".
The findings of our series - that nearly 60,000 burglaries went unsolved in New Zealand last year and that in 24 police districts not a single incident was resolved - suggests it is high time the police revised their priorities.