This week, the Christchurch mosque killer is seeking leave to appeal after filing his claim in 2022, out of time, in a bid to overturn his convictions and recant his guilty pleas for the mass shootings at two Christchurch mosques on March 15, 2019.
This week, the Christchurch mosque killer is seeking leave to appeal after filing his claim in 2022, out of time, in a bid to overturn his convictions and recant his guilty pleas for the mass shootings at two Christchurch mosques on March 15, 2019.
The Christchurch mosque shooter wanted to be described as a terrorist and was pleased when police laid a terrorism charge, his former lawyer has claimed.
Today, lawyers Jonathan Hudson and Shane Tait, who represented convicted killer Brenton Tarrant between March 2019 and July 2020, gave evidence for the Crownat the Court of Appeal in Wellington.
The gunman is seeking leave to appeal after filing his claim in 2022, out of time, in a bid to overturn his convictions and recant his guilty pleas for the mass shootings at two Christchurch mosques on March 15, 2019.
At the hearing, Hudson was questioned by one of Tarrant’s five lawyers, all of whom have name suppression, telling the court that when police laid a terrorism charge, Tarrant was pleased.
“He wanted to be described as a terrorist,” Hudson said.
There is conflicting evidence about whether Tarrant wanted to change his plea to guilty after initially entering not guilty pleas.
Yesterday, the terrorist told the court that he planned to represent himself at the time, and the only reason he retained his counsel was so they could tell him what was going on in the outside world.
Both Hudson and Tait denied that it was the case, telling the court that from their many meetings, they gained the impression that Tarrant always planned to plead guilty; it was just a matter of when.
Tait told the court that the gunman indicated that he would plead guilty at a time that suited him.
He said when he pressed him about his defence, asking “Brenton, what am I going to tell the jury if we go to trial?” his response was, ”Don’t worry, it’s not going to get that far".
Despite indications of a guilty plea, the lawyer said they continued preparing for a trial right up to the point he pleaded guilty. That continued to be the case until he entered his guilty pleas.
Tarrant had indicated that he wanted a defence of self-defence, but they explained this was not available to him and they didn’t believe he had a lawful defence to the charges he faced.
Brenton Tarrant gave evidence at the Court of Appeal on Monday morning. Photo / Ministry of Justice
Both lawyers were questioned about Tarrant’s conversation with them, in which he formally indicated he wanted to change his guilty plea in August 2019, something which Hudson admitted surprised him. He eventually pleaded guilty in March 2020.
Both denied that this had to do with his declining mental health.
Much of the questioning by one of the gunman’s current lawyers at today’s hearing centred on his mental health and questions over whether it deteriorated over the time he was in custody, when he was being held in solitary confinement.
Hudson told the court he “took comfort” from two mental health assessors’ reports, which indicated there were no problems with his fitness to plead.
The lawyer said his client’s mental health was consistent across the charges they faced.
In his evidence, Tarrant told the court at one meeting that the two had raised concerns about his mental health, saying he wasn’t speaking the same way. But neither lawyer said they could recall that conversation.
Both lawyers said the way they were treated in prison, when visiting the terrorist, was different from that of other lawyers visiting their clients. They claimed they were subjected to more stringent searches and were taken to the isolation unit where he was being held.
They said after some initial problems with the way he was being treated, including being handcuffed and forced to wear a suicide suit, all seemed to settle down after a month or so.
Tait told the court that he showed some anxiety during this period, but did not appear to be depressed.
Tarrant now says the guilty pleas he entered to 51 counts of murder, 40 counts of attempted murder and a single charge of engaging in a terrorist act were the result of harsh prison conditions, which drastically impacted his mental health.
Yesterday, the convicted terrorist spoke at length for the first time, by audiovisual link from prison.
Wearing a white shirt and dark rimmed glasses, his head shaved, Tarrant told the court he was effectively “forced” to plead guilty because of the harsh prison conditions.
“If I had another option, I would have taken it,” he said.
He told the court his mental health deteriorated after he was imprisoned and awaiting trial, and he was essentially not fit to plead guilty when he did.
The court also heard from a psychologist who concluded that the solitary confinement he was subjected to likely contributed to a decline in his mental health.
The hearing before Justices Christine French, David Collins, and Susan Thomas is set down for this week.
Catherine Hutton is an Open Justice reporter, based in Wellington. She has worked as a journalist at the Waikato Times and RNZ. Most recently she was working as a media adviser at the Ministry of Justice.
