The US Department of Justice claims Nomm's guilty plea was a major blow to Dotcom's case. But that was last night rejected by his legal team. His attorney, Ira Rothken, told the
Herald on Sunday
the guilty plea did not serve as a precedent.
"If Mr Nomm testifies in a truthful manner ... we expect that his testimony will help the defence.
"It's a plea bargain of convenience and the Department of Justice seems to have used this as a Hollywood-style publicity stunt to try to elevate the status of their case."
As part of Nomm's plea bargain, he agreed his co-accused, including Megaupload founder Dotcom, knew Megaupload.com and other sites the group operated contained copyright-infringing materials and they were making money from it.
Nomm said he brought up copyright infringement to colleagues, noting files he was sent to review for errors had FBI piracy warnings.
Dotcom did not return calls but tweeted: "I have nothing but compassion and understanding for Andrus Nomm and I hope he will soon be reunited with his son."