The project would ask New Zealanders how they saw the biosecurity system functioning now, what issues and pressures it was likely to face, and how the system might operate to protect all our interests, through to 2025.
An independent panel of three peer reviewers would include Dr John Hellstrom, Professor Mick Clout of The University of Auckland, and Glenice Paine, chair of the Te Atiawa Trust.
A draft direction statement would be developed and shared with a wide range of New Zealanders and would cover expectations of what the system should deliver by 2025 including priorities for action.
The final direction statement is expected to be confirmed by the end of the year.
Labour's Primary Industries spokesman Damien O'Connor said the review was an admission of failure.
"The Government has put our horticulture and agriculture industries at risk with its ill-conceived plans and lack of proper process.
"In his haste to speed up transtasman travel, the Prime Minister rushed through the decision to remove 100 per cent bag-screening, something that rightly appalled growers and farmers.
"That it's taken Nathan Guy years to move on the issue is a disgrace," Mr O'Connor said.