So is Labour to blame? Is the man who's been a Cabinet Minister for his entire political career, by-passing his back bench apprenticeship, justified in laying the blame at Labour's door?
The answer is no. The Act was revisited by National in 2010 but the so called complexity wasn't clarified which beggars the question: Why?
Well the Minister's explanation is about as deep as a puddle, and a particularly shallow one at that.
Joyce says as soon as people say the Holidays Act should be changed, "union representatives and a number of others say don't change it because we can't change anybody's entitlements at all."
Yeah well, accept that and you'll accept that unions don't want their members to get their just pay desserts, and of course National's the last party to want to get on the wrong side of the cloth caps.
The rules under the act seem pretty straight forward. Holiday pay's either calculated on the weekly pay at the time you're about to take your break or on the average pay you've received over previous year. The bosses have to pay whatever gives the worker the most money.
Trouble is some payroll computers calculate holiday pay on what's in the letter of the worker's contract, rather than what they've actually been earning.
But before you make an April fool of yourself and rush off to your paymaster demanding squillions, the biggest single payout yet is under two grand, just enough for a modest holiday.
Debate on this article is now closed.