“We’ve done a lot of work with communities, and that’s what they tell us.”
The way the banking system had evolved with private providers filling the ATM gap was not meeting the public’s needs or giving them the choice they deserved, he said.
Woolford wasn’t surprised banks were pushing back, given the estimated $ 100 million cost to them, but said “in the grand scheme of things” the benefits outweighed the cost.
Earlier, Banking Association CEO Roger Beaumont told Newstalk ZB’s Mike Hosking the “curious” proposal had come “completely out of the blue”.
“It’s kind of back to the future.
“It’s almost like Sport New Zealand demanding that jazzercise and leg warmers make a comeback without any appreciation of customer preferences, let alone demand,” he said.
“They are our regulator, so if they deem something essential and appropriate, they can make that call.
“But I think there’ll be a lot of discussion between now and when the proposal or consultation period closes in April.”
Banking expert Professor Claire Matthews from Massey University also rubbished the idea, telling Newstalk ZB’s Ryan Bridge Early Edition she’s not convinced so many ATMs or branches are needed.
“For most of us, cash is something that we use because we happen to have it, but it’s not what we want.“ And for small businesses, it’s not actually an advantage to them to have cash. Cash is unhygienic, unclean, and a real hassle to deal with.”
Needing cash during a natural disaster was the exception, but Matthews said she did not believe ATMs were the solution.