• Autistic man locked in isolation for five years
• Lives in a "seclusion room" with just a mattress and urine bottle
• Warnings from both the Ombudsman and the Human Rights Commission
• A review says he needs to be released to a community setting
• However, a delay with funding and
Autistic man locked in seclusion: 'You wouldn't do it to a dog'

Subscribe to listen
"Ashley is a significantly disabled man who is managing as best he can in spite of his continually experiencing a traumatising internal world," the review said. "Ashley's current living environment is not appropriate to his needs."
Ashley, who was the subject of a
last year, is a compulsory patient under the Mental Health Act. He has lived at Tawhirimatea since 2006, but was placed in the seclusion wing in 2010 after several violent episodes where he lashed out at other patients and staff. He was kept in because the assaults continued.

However the reviewers believe much of his aggression has been caused by his environment. They said there was a "mismatch" between Ashley's needs and the care he gets, and that for someone with sensory issues, the noise on the unit was too much.
They recommended a bespoke community service where Ashley could have a house and specialist staff to look after him, and "develop a life worth living".
Capital & Coast DHB say they have since put a "a process in place", however despite a provider being willing to take him, the necessary steps for Ashley's transition are yet to happen.
His elderly parents, Dave and Marlena Peacock, are fearful their son will never get out.
They say a combination of funding constraints, and a series of high-profile deaths involving mentally ill patients, are affecting Ashley's case.
"But tightening of funding should not be a justification to deny him basic human rights," Mrs Peacock said. "No one should have to endure what Ashley has endured. Seclusion is supposed to be a last resort, not a treatment like in his case."

Seclusion has been found to be traumatising for both staff and patients, and is considered a form of torture by the United Nations.
The practice is subject to a reduction policy in New Zealand, and is monitored by Crimes of Torture Act Inspectors from the Ombudsman's Office. They, alongside the Human Rights Commission, believe seclusion is still over-used and have repeatedly highlighted Ashley's case as a concern.
A 2013 investigation by Ombudsman Ron Paterson found "little doubt" that the protracted use of seclusion had contributed to an ongoing deterioration of Ashley's mental condition."
"My view is that the current situation has persisted for far too long," he said.
Disability Rights Commissioner Paul Gibson did not think enough was being done for Ashley, and that keeping him locked up would not make him well.
"I can't see how anyone could find any justification for keeping someone in seclusion for this number of years."

A dozen other lawyers, human rights experts and advocates and politicians told the Herald they agree, however Capital & Coast spokesman Nigel Fairley disputed the case was a breach of human rights.
He said in cases such as Ashley's there was always tension between protecting and upholding the rights of the individual, and the rights of members of the community to protection and safety."
Dr Fairley said funding discussions were continuing with the Ministry of Health. He refused to answer further questions about Ashley, citing privacy concerns even when offered a waiver.
The health board refused to release a Crimes of Torture Act report on Tawhirimatea in time for this story.
