"I think like everything with each event you learn what you might do better, but I'm pretty confident we will continue to do major events."
Hill said the dreamy images of Auckland's harbour were "worth an enormous amount" because they stayed with people and affected how they thought about a place.
America's Cup minister Stuart Nash told Newstalk ZB the country ended up with a fantastic event with global coverage despite being held in the middle of the global pandemic that no one could have forecast.
"If we knew we were going to have a global pandemic, we wouldn't have invested - but the outcome was we won the cup, we held a fantastic event, we got global coverage and the Auckland waterfront is world class."
Nash said even if Team New Zealand decided to accept the country's hosting offer, it still had to be approved by Cabinet and Auckland Council.
The comments come after an official cost-benefit report released yesterday revealed the New Zealand economy was left $293 million worse off from hosting the 36th America's Cup.
It was one of three government-commissioned reports released yesterday afternoon that found a number of factors, including Covid-19, a lack of challenging syndicates and overly high public investment resulted in "significant deficits" for Auckland and New Zealand.
Auckland's economy was left with a financial deficit of $146m following the event - a financial return of 72 cents back for every dollar put in.
However that return for Auckland rises to 85 cents for every dollar spent when "unpriced social, cultural or environmental effects" are taken into account. It also brings the cost to 79 cents in the dollar to New Zealand - a loss of $156m.
Auckland Council's spend on the event was $92m higher than had previously been made public due to bringing forward spending on already planned works. The council is defending the spend saying bringing the work forward will result in future savings of $67m.
Council had previously stated its investment in the event was $113m - but today those costs were revealed to be $215.2m.
Another report - The 36th America's Cup Impact Evaluation, which was independently conducted by Fresh Info - identified two main broad drivers that led to a benefit-cost ratio of 0.48 for New Zealand, meaning a loss of $292.7m.
The first driver was lower than projected levels of expenditure by foreign entities and visitors, as well as having three challengers rather than the projected eight. The second driver was the higher than projected public investment in the event.
However, the America's Cup Events (ACE) report painted a more positive economic picture.
The report said the event fostered an "extensive positive international profile" that "delivered an unrivalled showcasing of Auckland and New Zealand".
The ACE report cited there had been 860,000 visits to the Cup Village between December and March.
ACE spent a total of $45m including $26m on administration, $3.7m on TV production, $2.4m on the Race Village, $1.1m on social media, $629,000 on website costs, and $7m on "challenger or record event costs".
