People often feel the media should investigate systems of bureaucracy, to analyse whether a system is working or is inefficient or failing. But in order to do that, you have to have a victim who has suffered through that system and wants to talk about it.
Without a victim, it's simply an opinion, a point of view. With a victim, you have a first-hand experience, which can be used to confront a bureaucracy.
A victim also has the right to decide whether or not to disclose their story, and, in a situation like family violence, I would certainly prefer that a third party didn't pre-empt them. Every family violence situation has complexities, complications, and emotional turmoil.
From an outsider, if it was laid bare, it would sound matter-of-fact awful, but these situations are deeply personal, and change day to day.
Culturally, it would not be easy for a man to disclose that he suffered because his female partner was violent to him.
For those who might struggle to disclose, every Herald story on family violence this week has a link to "speak up", to enable people to write their own stories, for others to read.
That may be a useful first step to putting your story together -- and seeing how other people react to it.