This was fascinating. I'd never considered the possibility that gender biases would be so deeply entrenched within our justice system.
Those who reject the "chivalry thesis" make claims that women's law-breaking tends to be less serious than that of men, hence the comparably lighter sentences. But a 1999 study using a Ministry of Justice database "[w]ith all independent variables controlled" confirmed "that men were more likely than women to be imprisoned."
It's thought that the domestic role of women as caregivers and centres of the family units is likely to help them secure lighter sentences. Other factors assisting the chivalry theory are that prison is often considered to be a harsher environment for women than it is for men and, thanks to there being fewer women's prisons, female prisoners are likely to be incarcerated further from home than male prisoners typically are.
Jeffries ends with the comment: "New Zealand society, the criminal justice system, and to some extent, feminist discussions ... present most men in terms of thinking, acting, powerful human beings, while simultaneously embracing women's powerlessness and dependency."
All of which must present something of a feminist conundrum. Should women embrace powerlessness and dependency in order to benefit from the more lenient treatment afforded by sexist attitudes within the judicial system or should we get all feisty, demand equal treatment and take our medicine like a man? It poses quite the dilemma.
- HERALD ONLINE