What's not to love about the royal family? Its members are stars of the longest running soap opera ever created. And when Diana was around it had more drama than Coronation Street. During the 1983 royal tour, I waited in a Wellington street to eyeball Charles and Diana. I was
Shelley Bridgeman: The cost of the royal visit - is it worth it?
Subscribe to listen
Access to Herald Premium articles require a Premium subscription. Subscribe now to listen.
Already a subscriber? Sign in here
Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech.
Opinion by Shelley Bridgeman
Shelley Bridgeman is a columnist for Lifestyle at The New Zealand Herald.
Learn more
AdvertisementAdvertise with NZME.
AdvertisementAdvertise with NZME.
I'd never understood the motivation behind all the unkind words about the royals that anonymous posters leave on various websites. They accuse them of being lazy, of living a pampered life at the expense of others. With more than a modicum of bitterness, they list the expensive holidays taken and the fancy clothes Kate wears - and use them as further evidence of her unworthiness.
I'd always thought that what the Cambridges get up to in their spare time is really none of our business. So when Royals jet to Maldives revealed they were off on a week's stay at "one of the most exclusive resorts in the Indian Ocean - the five-star Cheval Blanc Randheli Hotel", I didn't bat an eyelid.
Nor was I bothered when it was reported that six protection officers accompanied William and Kate to a private function to which Kate wore a $2,700 designer coat. Some of the readers were though: "A pair of lead royals that only know how to waste our taxes," said one. "SIX police protection officers!! How much does this cost?" asked another.
But, after watching Breakfast's Australia correspondent report that it can cost up to $100,000 per hour to host royals on tour, those curmudgeonly responses suddenly seemed a lot less churlish.
In Royal Trio Visit to New Zealand Cost Taxpayers whopping $1M Per Day - which made those two scheduled "rest" days look positively frivolous - John Key was quoted as saying that the royal tour will afford us "tremendous international coverage".
Clearly the opportunity to show off New Zealand as a tourist destination to a royal hungry global audience is an extremely valuable one. Yet I'd have thought it was a two-way street; the tour is also a chance for the young royals to engage with their future subjects, display some relevance and potentially fend off the march of republicanism for just a bit longer. If this tour is worth huge sums of money to our country, surely it also holds a certain value for the visitors themselves.
It was recently reported that the Cambridges are "keen to portray themselves as 'modern' royals". It's doubtful as to how well they're achieving that goal so far because the same article revealed their "travelling party" will include two private secretaries, three press officers, a tour secretary, a hairdresser, a personal assistant, an orderly, a nanny and a former diplomat.
Arriving with an entourage of 11 helpers is about as conducive to being viewed as "modern" as expecting New Zealand taxpayers to fund their junket. They'd look a lot more current if they stumped up for half the cost of their own trip. Perhaps they might even be inspired to pare back their bloated "travelling party".
AdvertisementAdvertise with NZME.
Should New Zealand taxpayers fund the royal tour? Is it worth $1-million a day?
