It's official. A study has discovered that the name you bestow on your newborn can affect its future. Who would have thought? You mean to say twins called Benson and Hedges might stand out from their peers - and not in a good way? So inventing names, mangling spellings and
inserting random apostrophes are inadvisable? Gosh, we learn something new every day.
Most new parents appear to fall into one of two camps. There are the traditionalists who want a nice, normal name that no one will bat an eyelid at. Hello Sarah, Elizabeth, William and Jack. Then there are the people determined to be original and stand out from the crowd. Like television characters Kath and Kim, they consider "unusual" to be a desirable attribute.
"Oh, yes, that's noice, different, unusual," they say about Sativa-Rochee, KleeShay and Qba (names I encountered on Trade Me's Parenting message-board).
I must belong to the first group because the simplicity of a regular name appeals to me. I'm not inclined to inflict a child with a lifelong need to clarify the spelling - or worse, the pronunciation - of their name. Don't think I'm deriding cultural names or prized family names here; it's the creation of one-of-a-kind, plucked-out-of-thin-air names to which I am drawing attention.
The morning I went into labour our baby was going to be either Ella or Tom and there was no room for debate. But somehow during those mind-numbing hours in the delivery room we ended up discarding Ella in favour of Katie - a name we considered possibly less fashionable, less of the moment. (Our instincts were correct: according to Statistics NZ that year 302 babies were named Ella while 93 were called Katie.) I'd have loved to have spelled it "Katy" (slightly cuter) but we opted for the standard form so it was as user-friendly as possible.
