Anyway, this lesson plan has created such a ruckus it would be a shame not to give it a bit more oxygen. Because the point that is conveniently lost in all the outrage is that, from a feminist perspective, the examples used do indeed promote, possibly even glorify, a misogynistic world view.
Yes, men are also pigeonholed in traditional tales; they are beasts, handsome princes, dwarves and knights in shining armour. Supporting female characters - wicked stepmothers, ugly sisters and evil queens - are stereotypical, too. No one is saying that these hackneyed character types are positive or uplifting either.
But let's focus on the central female characters. Even a cursory examination reveals that they tend to be beautiful, passive and unfulfilled without a man (which makes them heteronormative as well as antifeminist but let's not go there right now).
Beauty and the Beast:
"The movie says if a woman is pretty and sweet natured she can change an abusive man into a kind and gentle man," says the lesson plan. (The idea that this movie is about domestic violence was also raised in a 2012 thesis entitled "Passively Ever After: Disney's Cinematic Abuse in Beauty and the Beast".)
Cinderella:
This story propagates the belief that women are household skivvies, beauty is all-important and marriage to a handsome prince is a woman's ultimate goal.
Sleeping Beauty:
Female characters don't get much more passive than this. As early as at her christening she is betrothed to marry a prince in order to unite two kingdoms. She's finally awakened from a deep sleep by the kiss of her true love.
Snow White:
According to the lesson plan: "She doesn't mind house work because she is sure a rich young man will soon come and take her away."
The Little Mermaid:
"This one drastically changes her physical appearance so as to be more attractive ... The price is that she can't speak. No problem, she has nothing of value to say anyhow. She is saved by a prince."