But looking back, I think my dissatisfaction stemmed from the bland and derivative incoherence of the whole experience. The enigma begins with its curious name - I always think a restaurant's name should conjure an image of what to expect and Culpeper sounds like sherry and stuffed partridge to me - and continues through the selection of food, which seems to have collected every new restaurant fad from all over town for the past few years and dumped them in one place.
Sashimi (in a restaurant that isn't Japanese); sliders; fried chicken (okay, it's duck); a salad with kale and seeds; jerk chicken; lamb ribs; pulled pork; smoked brisket: hell, by the time I reached the end of the menu I could hardly keep my eyes open.
The Culpeper has taken over half the footprint of Euro (and is, in the post-Gault era, under the eye of the same executive chef, Gareth Stewart) and it's a light and pretty space - greenery and tiles and pastel colours.
Of what we tried, the kingfish sashimi was fine (what's not to like about raw fish?) and the "botanist's" salad - whose name suggests Noma-style foraging - was perfectly unexceptionable but the crispy fried duck's flesh was only slightly moister than the coating (which had a little sweet note I couldn't place).
A colleague has written glowingly of the brisket, but the short rib of beef, which purported to have been smoked for 14 hours, was chewy and dry and the oddly named "giant" squid (giant squid is inedible) was a very small serving, although that may have been a postmodern joke.
In the end, it was not really a bad meal - it lacked the character to deserve such an adjective - but it felt like a long series of afterthoughts.
I can't help feeling the place is best regarded as a bar.
Smaller plates $13-$32; From the firepit $17-$45; desserts $16.
VERDICT: Bland and derivative.