OPINION:
Where do you stand on breasts? Bosoms, knockers, bazookas, melons, orbs, globes or baps? And I don't mean from an aesthetic perspective. As any "old master", man or woman will agree, they can be nice to look at. Also, unarguably useful, what with their ability to feed miniature humans, to develop their immunity and central nervous systems. No, I'm talking about where you might stand from ethical and political perspectives. Because we seem to have got ourselves into quite the tangle about these apparently innocuous female body parts.
By "we", I mean women. According to a new study, published in Sexuality and Culture journal, when more than 300 men and women were shown images of topless women in different scenarios and locations and asked to rate them on levels of appropriateness, women were far more likely to be offended by the sight of bare breasts in public than men. And while it's hardly surprising that men are more amenable to chance sightings of boobies, the notion that women are "on average two points" less favourable is both paradoxical and telling. About the contorted female state of mind, about first, second, third and fourth-wave feminism – or wherever the hell we are with the waves today. About how we want to be perceived, what we should be, and how much dissonance there is among women on both counts.
This time last year I was taken aback by the sight of two teenage girls sunbathing topless in Holland Park. Then I was taken aback by the fact that I was taken aback. Until a few years ago, I'd always sunbathed topless on European holidays: for tan-line reasons but also because I enjoyed the feeling of freedom. That freedom (and so many others) was killed off by the iPhone (and others of their ilk), which I suspect is the real reason behind the annual headline: "Is Topless Sunbathing Dead?"