Mr Battenburg took the executors of Ms Condon's will, two of his cousins, to the NSW Supreme Court, arguing his aunt had not been of sound mind when she signed the will as she told her solicitor she kept the will under the cat's bed.
He also said Ms Condon had been suffering delirium from septicaemia caused by a cat scratch at the time.
But it was rejected by the judge who said the medical records showed no evidence of a cognitive decline at the time the will was signed and the cat's bed comment did not indicate "irrational thinking".
Mr Battenberg launched an appeal, claiming there was insufficient evidence to prove his aunt knew about the changes to her will.
The NSW Court of Appeal knocked him back again in a short judgment today.
"The evidence before the primary judge clearly justified a firm conclusion that (Ms Condon) knew and approved of the contents of the 2016 will," the court ruled.