Anyone with a teenager knows what a struggle mornings are - they're not exactly naturally high functioning animals first thing.
Sleep experts in the UK recently urged authorities to alter school hours to allow adolescents to stay in bed longer. They cited benefits to their mental health, to attaining better results, and to combat obesity.
Nothing, it turns out, beats sleep. They're doing it in Paris of course - France's education minister approved pushing the school day back an hour for teenagers.
But it's not just the kids who'd like, or in fact need, a longer sleep-in.
Teachers and school leaders often complain about how tired teens are in class, how lacking in concentration they are first thing in the morning. And that's not entirely teenagers' fault.
Scientists say that our circadian rhythms change in adolescence - it's a shift of about two hours - which means teens become wired to go to sleep later.
One paediatric sleep consultant says teenagers are "in a different time zone".
So given that, and given the importance of sleep for their health, delaying the school day by an hour would seem an obvious thing to do.
But - and there's always a big 'but' here - what happens when they start work?
What happens when tired teens are out of school and have never learned to get themselves up earlier than 8 or 9 o'clock - and they're expected to function in the working world?
Not to mention the disruption for families of changing timetables around to suit teenagers. Hitting snooze for an extra hour just to pander to teenagers' altered circadian rhythms doesn't necessarily work for everyone.
So perhaps if a sleep-in is off the cards schools could take note and maybe just not schedule double maths first period.