Is that a power suit with shoulder pads or trackies and socks? I don't know, I guess it depends on your interpretation.
The main thrust of the new boss's point is that swimsuits and heels are no longer on the menu. Who decided for us, unilaterally, that women don't want to wear swimsuits and heels? That doesn't matter I guess, someone did and seemingly we are all now part of the collective of women who decide things for all of us.
But this contest still has "Miss" in the title. Maybe that's next year's challenge.
What I'm saying is, personally, I'd rather die than parade round in my togs and heels in front of a row of judges, but that's just me. I'm not presumptuous enough to assume that all women think the same as me.
It reminds me of the scantily clad grid girls debate. They were scuttled after women called them out saying their outfits were sexist and the role demeaning. That conveniently overlooked the fact that actually many pit girls liked their job and their outfits, and weren't too keen on the feminazi speaking on their behalf and pushing for the cancellation of their jobs.
Don't get me wrong, I'm all for empowerment and evolution and few would probably argue against changes being made to beauty contests, but to grab the #MeToo banner and use it as a flag to wave in a new era of souls over swimsuits seems a bit of a stretch, given the organisation.
To be frank, a contest which pits women against each other vying for a sparkly crown and the title of "Miss" Anything doesn't really scream empowerment to me.
But with professional darts axing walk-on girls, Formula One scrapping grid girls, Miss America surely in this new world order has seen the writing on the wall, no matter how beautiful the inside of their souls are.