"It may help us turn the corner a little bit on managing diabetes and reducing the risk of cardiovascular events," said Richard Chazal, president-elect of the American College of Cardiology, who called the findings "pretty exciting."
Lilly of Indianapolis and Germany's Boehringer previewed the study results last month by saying Jardiance, which was introduced in the US last year, reduced the likelihood of heart attacks, strokes and deaths from heart disease in high- risk patients, though they didn't disclose the full data at the time.
Before the release of the data, Leerink analyst Seamus Fernandez said in a research note that a reduction in cardiovascular risks of 15 per cent or more could lead to a revision in clinical guidelines, which could be meaningful for sales of the drug.
The data was presented Thursday at the European Association for the Study of Diabetes annual meeting in Stockholm and published in the New England Journal of Medicine.
More than half of the trial participants had diabetes for more than 10 years, and 48 per cent were taking insulin, according to Zinman. A majority were taking drugs aimed at preventing heart disease, with 77 per cent on statins, 82 per cent on aspirin, and 95 per cent on anti-hypertensives.
"These patients were all receiving state-of-the-art cardiovascular prevention care," he said. "So the benefit that we see is on top of the treatments we all recommend. That's pretty amazing."
That raises the question of whether the drug could be expanded to other patient groups with heart disease, Zinman said.
The Jardiance trial was conducted to meet regulators' demands that makers of diabetes drugs show their products don't harm the heart, a concern first raised with GlaxoSmithKline Plc's Avandia in 2007. All other studies so far have failed to show a benefit.
Until today, a trial of Merck's Januvia released in June and showing no harm was considered the best available option because it ruled out higher risk. The class of drug that Jardiance belongs to typically lowers body weight and blood pressure.
"It's going to create a huge stir," Zinman said. "The question really is: Is this almost a paradigm shift in our thinking of how we should treat diabetes?"