Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor can stay at Royal Lodge until next October, although the 'current expectation' is that he would move in the first quarter of 2026. Photo / Getty Images
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor can stay at his Windsor home until next October, it has emerged.
The Crown Estate revealed on Tuesday (local time) that while Mountbatten-Windsor had served notice on Royal Lodge on October 30, his lease allowed him to continue living there for at least another 12 months.
However, a royal source insisted the “current expectation” was that he would move in the first quarter of 2026. The Telegraph understands that he plans to relocate to the Sandringham estate as soon as his new home is ready and appropriate security provision is in place.
The King forced Mountbatten-Windsor to give up the lease to Royal Lodge in October and stripped him of his titles amid escalating anger over his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein.
There was further outcry when it emerged that for more than 20 years, Mountbatten-Windsor had only paid a peppercorn rent on his home, prompting the Commons public accounts committee to demand answers from the Crown Estate about how the Royal family’s properties were managed.
The lease arrangements were published on Tuesday by the committee, whose chairman Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown has announced an inquiry into such property arrangements and whether they offer value for money for the taxpayer.
Mountbatten-Windsor could be summoned to give evidence before the committee, the Telegraph understands. However, MPs have no power to force him to attend should he refuse to comply.
The public accounts committee published letters from both the Crown Estate and the Treasury explaining the various arrangements.
The correspondence confirmed that Mountbatten-Windsor will not receive compensation for giving up Royal Lodge because of the extent of repairs needed.
The Telegraph revealed last month that he would be denied any refund, having failed to adhere to requirements to maintain the vast estate, which included ensuring the exterior stonework was in good condition every five years and that the interior was painted every seven years.
Under the terms of his 75-year lease, Mountbatten-Windsor could have been entitled to £488,000 ($1.1m) for an early surrender of his contract.
But the Crown Estate said the property was so dilapidated that in “all likelihood” he would “not be owed any compensation”.
It also admitted that an independent architect had been appointed to monitor the upkeep, but that inspections were carried out on a “need-only” basis.
While Mountbatten-Windsor is still living at Royal Lodge, he remains responsible for the ongoing costs of maintenance and repair of the sprawling Windsor property.
Elsewhere, it was revealed that once Mountbatten-Windsor and his ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson, have moved out of their home, it could be leased on the open market.
The documents also show that Mountbatten-Windsor retains a lease with the Crown Estate on a lodge in the grounds of Sunninghill Park, his marital home, which is occupied by a member of staff.
Mountbatten-Windsor sold the 12-bedroom mansion, which was a wedding gift from the late Queen, to Kazakh billionaire Timur Kulibayev, in 2007 for £15m ($34.5m) – £3m ($6.9m) over the asking price – only for it to remain empty for almost a decade.
The spending watchdog also published information about the Prince and Princess of Wales’ lease on Forest Lodge, their new Windsor home.
The committee said the couple, who moved into the property with their children in October, has a “20-year non-assignable lease” with the Crown Estate that began on July 5 this year with “open market rent”.
The agreement was made after the Prince made an initial approach, following discussions with the Royal Household.
The Crown Estate said: “Negotiations were conducted on an arm’s length basis, to ensure appropriate market terms were agreed”.
It said independent valuers from Hamptons and Savills estate agents were appointed to value the property, while the Prince and Princess received independent legal and property advice.
The documents also revealed that the Duke of Edinburgh, who has leased the 51-acre (20ha) Bagshot Park in Surrey from the Crown Estate for the past 25 years, also pays a peppercorn rent.
Like Mountbatten-Windsor, who paid an initial outlay of £8.5m ($19.5m) between 2003 and 2005, the Duke paid £5m ($11.5m) upfront on a 150-year lease.
Meanwhile, Princess Alexandra, Elizabeth II’s cousin, pays little more than £2700 ($6218) a year to live in the Grade II listed Thatched House Lodge within Richmond Park.
Clifton-Brown said that having “reflected” on the information provided, the committee had decided to launch an inquiry based on the information it had received from the Treasury and Crown Estate, as well as from the National Audit Office, which recently updated a report it produced in 2005 examining the Royal family’s leases.
The date of its first evidence session will be announced in due course.
Clifton-Brown said: “We would like to thank the Crown Estate Commissioners and HM Treasury for their considered responses to our questions.
“In publishing these responses, the public accounts committee fulfils one of its primary purposes – to aid transparency in public interest information, as part of its overall mission to secure value for money for the taxpayer.
“Having reflected on what we have received, the information provided clearly forms the beginnings of a basis for an inquiry. The National Audit Office (NAO) supports the scrutiny function of this committee.
“We now await the conclusions the NAO will draw from this information, and plan to hold an inquiry based on the resulting evidence base in the new year.”
Dan Labbad, chief executive of the Crown Estate, said: “We very much welcome the news of the committee’s inquiry. We have provided detailed answers to the committee’s questions to date and look forward to working with the NAO and responding to further questions to support the inquiry process”.
The Crown Estate – a vast portfolio of land and property – belongs to the reigning monarch “in right of the Crown” but it is not their private property.
It is run as an independent business, with profits paid directly to the Treasury. A proportion of the money, known as the Sovereign Grant, is then handed to the Royal family to support their official duties.
Sign up to Herald Premium Editor’s Picks, delivered straight to your inbox every Friday. Editor-in-Chief Murray Kirkness picks the week’s best features, interviews and investigations. Sign up for Herald Premium here.