Rock forward eight months to a village school - in southwest France, peasant and rural - of 47 with one teacher for his class of 22 or so. His teacher, late 50s I suppose, female with good English, sat with her mouth open as Jean-Luc tried to explain to her how he was doing a maths task. She was horrified, she was dumbfounded.
The kids here learn one way and one way only. They set out their maths work differently, they work on graph paper, they show their workings in an orderly manner, anything less is not accepted. It's easy to follow and yes it has to be right. Move on three months.
Last week my son got 100 per cent in maths in long division - he was rapt. All done by hand and with a time limit. In a subject that he hated at home, which he now loves. He is so proud of himself. And we cannot believe the difference in his attitude to maths.
Kids need to learn maths at school - teachers need to be able to teach maths and teach it well. The pluses and the minuses, the times tables, long division. Learning seven strategies takes valuable time away from getting the answers right.
Kids need to be able to do 12 times tables, kids need to be able to do long division and more. Without maths, their opportunities later in life will be severely trimmed.
We were clearly told our son was a maths dunce (although not in those words) and that he should take extra help, for which we would have to pay.
What happens to those who cannot afford this?
Whatever his teacher and vice-principal thought, it was solved here, in a country village school, by a teacher doing it one way, and one way only - and in a foreign language more often than not.
Debate on this article is now closed.