Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie were giving Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge, what would appear to be some rather chilly looks. Photo / Getty Images
Without doubt, it is a situation that few women would want to find themselves in: being photographed anywhere near the naturally elegant, uber-slender Duchess of Cambridge.
Spare a thought, then, for Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie. This week at a Buckingham Palace garden party, the sisters were pictured trailing in the wake of Kate, who was a vision in a fitted cream Alexander McQueen coat, reported the Daily Mail.
The three women weren't walking together, gossiping companionably, as you might imagine, say, Zara Phillips, Beatrice and Eugenie might have done. More than that, the Princesses were giving the Duchess what would appear to be some rather chilly looks.
For who could outshine the flawless Kate? After all, even the world's most glamorous women - from A-list actress Nicole Kidman to First Lady Michelle Obama - have been left looking a little dull in the Duchess's radiant presence.
Poor Beatrice and Eugenie, despite being dressed up to the nines in a £1,700 Burberry dress and a £300 Alice + Olivia printed skirt respectively, simply couldn't compete. As a result, the atmosphere between the three young royal women looked decidedly cool.
Some say that this froideur, on what was supposed to be an idyllic occasion, a celebration of the Queen's 90th birthday, is not new.
Tensions are said to have begun to surface in the early years of Kate's relationship with William - and are rooted in far more than mere sartorial competitiveness.
From Beatrice and Eugenie remaining close pals with the one woman by whom Kate has ever felt threatened - the stunning Isabella Branson, whom William is said to have propositioned during the couple's brief split - to perceived slights against Kate's sister Pippa by the Princesses, the relationship between the three women is not as easy as it could be.
And apparently, this frosty feeling has only been intensified by what some see as Kate's preferential treatment by The Firm ahead of Beatrice and Eugenie.
Take this week's garden party as an example. One guest told me: 'As William and Kate were ushered by a flurry of flunkeys down a long line of excited people, who stopped and stared or rushed forward trying to think of something to say, Beatrice and Eugenie were just left to go walkabout on their own - which they did very sweetly and well, spending a long time talking to all the people in wheelchairs. There was no sense of rush with them.'
But, the same guest added, as William and Kate were the obvious 'big ticket, box-office draw in neon lights', the contrast between guests' interest in the Cambridge couple and the York Princesses was acute.
'As there were three separate garden parties, it might have been kinder to let Beatrice and Eugenie be the young stars in their own right at one of the other two, rather than go around in the shadow of the Cambridges. Few egos are small enough to cope with this kind of thing.'
As one insider puts it: 'Royalty is all about pecking order, often in a cruelly blunt sense, and it is Kate who has all the toys and the position.
'Despite being the only young "blood Princesses" (in other words, born royal), Beatrice and Eugenie have been reduced to walk-on parts in Royal Family life.
'It particularly hurt when Kate did solo engagements with the Queen during the Diamond Jubilee. They felt snubbed.
'Their father sometimes takes up the cudgels on their behalf - for example, when they lost their paid-for royal protection officers. But while the Queen is too old to make a fuss or rock the boat, Charles remains determined to have a smaller task force, namely himself, his own offspring and their families.'
A royal task force that emphatically does not include Beatrice and Eugenie, it seems.
It is hard to imagine that at one time, William and Harry and Beatrice and Eugenie felt almost like equals. When the Princes were children, according to a source, 'Diana would take the boys swimming at Fergie's house every Sunday' and 'in 1996, they all went on holiday together to the South of France.
'They were so close, despite the age gap [there are six years between William and Beatrice]. It's tragic, really.'
Then Diana, the link between the two sets of children, died. And Fergie succeeded in embarrassing the family over and over again - offering access to Prince Andrew for money in 2010, to give just one example.
Charles sought to distance himself from Fergie. 'He cannot stand even the mention of her name,' said the source.
As the girls remain commendably loyal to their mother, perhaps it was inevitable that some kind of rift would appear between the cousins - and, in turn, with Kate.
Beatrice, who by all accounts is dedicated to her grandmother, is said to have been particularly upset at being sidelined - so much so that before the royal wedding, according to one source, she 'went to confront, in a charming fashion, William about her role [within the Royal Family].
'This was when he was living at St James's Palace. He kept her waiting for ages, then said it wasn't his decision what she was included in - all very friendly, but it didn't achieve anything.'
Cracks began to show when conflict emerged between the Princesses and the Middleton sisters.
Apparently, there was an incident in 2008 at a London fashion show for Issa, a favourite brand of the Royals and the Middletons. Organisers asked an already seated Beatrice and Eugenie to shuffle up in the front row to make room for Pippa Middleton. It is said they refused.
Depending on who you talk to, this was a case of the Princesses being regal and unfriendly or Pippa being unnecessarily pushy because she didn't want to lose face by suffering the social death that is being made to sit in the second row.
'Pathetic, maybe, but however you look at it, people remember these things. They deplete mutual goodwill, if there is any to begin with,' said one society girl who was there.
There was more trouble in 2008, when Kate organised a charity roller disco (at which she memorably fell on her back on the dancefloor, clad in sequins and hotpants).
It is said that, somehow, Beatrice wasn't initially invited to the bash. Then, when an invitation was apparently extended to her - but not by Kate, according to sources - the Princess wasn't made aware of the Eighties dress code and arrived in an ordinary dress, while everyone else was in neon outfits.
Beatrice, it seems, blamed Kate. Some say there were tears.
Then came the stress of the royal wedding in 2011, when the Princesses were doubly humiliated.
First, Fergie was very publicly not invited. Regardless of their mother's actions, Beatrice and Eugenie could certainly be forgiven for agreeing with those who thought it a little small-minded of William, who controlled the guest list, to so humiliate her.
Second, and perhaps even worse, Beatrice's long-standing boyfriend, Dave Clark, was not invited to the wedding.
Why? 'William has the Spencer paranoia gene,' says one source. 'Dave is a gregarious, chatty American and William is so private it hurts. He would accuse his dog of being indiscreet if it barked at someone else too often.'
Fascinatingly, a few weeks later, Clark was asked to Zara Phillips's wedding to Mike Tindall, even though it was a much smaller affair. 'He was very friendly to [William and Kate] to show he didn't mind,' says a source. The snub, however, could not be erased.
That Clark is so convivial is revealing because socially, as a royal intimate points out, the Princesses could not be more 'tribally different' from William and Kate.
'Beatrice and Eugenie have a very glitzy, international, party-girl streak - particularly Beatrice. They like the deck of a superyacht, a chalet pool, a New York dance floor or a hot new restaurant in LA.
The scandalous true-crime murder case that shocked New Zealand.