Council was at the Takapuwhaia Marae to observe the launch of maramataka, the Māori lunar calendar that shapes their customary cycle of planting, harvesting, hunting and fishing. It is part of Matariki, the winter solstice that starts the Māori New Year. Kāpiti has three iwi with established mana whenua status. They take turn hosting this annual launch. It's funded by KCDC through Te Whakaminenga o Kapiti, its Māori Liaisons Committee. The calendar provides an opportunity to each iwi to highlight the history that legitimises their mana whenua status.
This year's maramataka recounts the story of Ngāti Toa Rangatira's birth as a sovereign tribe and its journey south from Kawhia, led by their fighting chief Te Rauparaha, to the Wellington region and the north of the South Island. It comes at a time when the 25-year history of Te Whakaminenga is feeling the pressure of change. A time when the triennial review of the MOU that underpins council's Treaty partnership is overdue. Council is also scheduled to progress the next Long Term Plan which, under the Local Government Act, requires council to provide Māori the capacity to engage.
The pressure for change has the potential to reset council's relationship with its mana whenua partners. This will see the increased ability of council to meet its Treaty obligations as interpreted through the RMA and LGA.
And what about the 2012 Takamore case where the Supreme Court specifically recognised Māori tikanga was part of the country's common law as opposed to statue law? Did the worshippers of ye olde English common law continuing to be the "civilised" backbone of New Zealand's common law happen to read Martin Van Beynen's article on Stuff (July 9, 2020) on the potential of the Supreme Court making another landmark decision to further entrench Māori customary tikanga into New Zealand law. It's around whether the appeal by Peter Ellis against his 1993 child abuse conviction can continue after his death.
Tikanga holds that a person's mana continues through the extended family after that person's death. Van Beynen notes: "Such a decision could potentially send NZ law in a new uncharted direction". Judges, as agents of change, it seems, will be the avenue though which tikanga will seep into New Zealand law. Van Beynen balances the article with a view from lawyer Stephen Franks who thinks this will set a dangerous trend undermining democracy and the rule of law.
We should await the view from the Velociraptor elites of the intelligentsia, the high bench of the Supreme Court.