Ngai Tahu defends Māori sites amid Grey District protest

The new Māwhera Pa building, part of the Pounamu Pathway, opened in late 2023 at the entrance to the Greymouth CBD. Photo / LDR

Poutini Ngāi Tahu has defended Māori sites of significance after the Grey District called for them to be cut from the West Coast’s proposed one district plan.

Important sites and areas for Māori are granted greater recognition and protections under the proposed combined plan for the Buller, Grey and Westland district councils - referred to as the Te Tai o Poutini Plan (TTPP).

Poutini Ngāi Tahu legal counsel Sarah Scott told the Te Tai o Poutini Plan commissioners this week that Grey’s last minute legal plea to cull a chapter on the sites and areas of significance to Māori read “more as a complaint”.

In March, the Grey District Council raised concerns that the significant areas chapter could affect property rights and cause future problems. Buller and Westland district councils have raised no objections with identifying the Maori sites of significance.

Scott said it would be more appropriate for the Grey District Council to go via the High Court with its concerns.

“[Grey District’s] submission effectively challenges the consultation period notification. That is not relevant at this point,” Scott said.

Evidence provided by council’s senior planning officer Michael McEnaney read “more as a complaint” on behalf of council rather than that of an independent planner, she said.

However, McEnaney defended his stance.

Almost all of the buildings in the Greymouth town centre sit on 202ha of Māori Reserve held under the ownership of Māwhera Incorporation. Photo / LDR

Council was concerned about securing “buy-in” from affected landowners who it felt should have been consulted at the very outset on significant Māori sites, he said.

Commissioner Sharon McGarry asked McEnaney if Grey’s late submission was more about council not getting its way previously on the matter.

McEnaney said that might be, but Grey was focused on protecting private property rights.

He could not say if council staff had seen the Sites and Areas Significant to Māori (SASM) draft before its approval by the TTPP committee in May 2022.

But council staff had experienced a litany of “bewilderment” from constituents since, McEnaney said.

Dark history in Greymouth

Earlier in the hearing, Poutini Ngāi Tahu historian Paul Madgwick touched on the dark history in which Greymouth was built on Māwhera Pa.

This followed the unjust purchase by the Crown in 1860 of the entire Poutini region for just £350.

“The Greymouth council for the last 160 years has been largely responsible for the disenfranchisement of our people from its land,” Madgwick said.

“It’s really sad that the council continues to do that.

“Poutini Ngai Tahu will have a say in the resource consents for each of those sites, whether or not we end up with SASMs.”

Madgwick said he “struggled” to see how Grey could now oppose the TTPP chapter on significant sites.

“I struggle that a territorial authority with responsibility from Ikamatua to Taramakau, has seen fit to oppose every SASM across the entire region.”

He dismissed the claim that by identifying significant sites for Māori, Poutini Ngai Tahu wanted access to private land.

“We do not want private access. We have not raised that: that is not true at all,” Madgwick said.

Chief commissioner Dean Chrystal told Madgwick their work on significant sites and areas was “an amazing job”.

“You may have set a standard for others moving forward,” he said.

On March 25, the Grey District Council passed a resolution against SASM amid concerns over the “process” affecting property rights, and allegations of “massive issues further down the track”.

Te Rununga o Ngati Wae Wae representative Francois Tumahai, not present at the time, told LDR afterwards he was “blown away” given their formal partnership.

On May 1, commissioner Sharon McGarry asked McEnaney if council had truly “not had time” to check SASMs for accuracy in the past two years.

“That’s a long time for council to do it’s own checks. Has that been done?”

McEnaney said no.

He agreed that lodging submissions and appearing before the TTPP hearing panel was “having dialogue” to resolve issues in the plan including on SASMs.

Commissioner Paul Rogers suggested the district council could have also used the opportunity to “use the telephone” or send an email with concerns previously.

McEnaney agreed, but said council may have “expressed a view” on SASMs to the TTPP but may have been “outvoted”.

Te Rūnanga o Makaawhio chairman and Poutini historian Paul Madgwick is also a member of the Te Tai o Poutini Plan Committee, and the editor of the Greymouth Star. He took no part in commissioning, writing or editing this story.

LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.