Marsh said several parties, including the Attorney-General, had been granted leave to appeal the Court of Appeal’s decision, but the Government considered it best to achieve its goals through legislation rather than by going through the Supreme Court.
“There are existing customary rights, this is about having those legally recognised. It does not take away the customary rights that exist, it does not for mine, ignore the inherent connection that people like we have heard in the court during these proceedings have with their Takutai Moana.”
When asked by claimant lawyers if Cabinet and its individual members were bound to uphold and respect the principles of the Treaty, Marsh chose not to comment.
Earlier Goldsmith defended his comments at a private meeting with seafood industry representatives in May, where he said the proposed law change “should reduce the 100% of coastline subject to Customary Marine Title to 5%”.
The figure was just part of “free-flowing discussion” and not based on any analysis, he said.
Evidence submitted to the tribunal on behalf of Te Roroa shows Te Arawhiti, including Marsh, had engaged with the iwi as part of its application for coastal rights while the minister was meeting with seafood industry representatives.