Notably, the Government has delayed any decision on a key nutrient limits pending further analysis of their worth, rather than going ahead with strict limits that one study estimated would cost $100,000 each for up to a third of the region's farms, threatening their viability.
It has also not proceeded with proposals to universally use OverseerFM in water regulations – the council strongly advised the OverseerFM model was not fit for that purpose.
"We're delighted the Government agrees OverseerFM is best used as originally intended - for farmers to review and improve on-farm nutrient management," David says.
The Government has also eased up on an initial proposal to impose a blanket 5m setback for all riparian fencing, saying now that 3m is the minimum.
Importantly for Taranaki, all existing council riparian plan fencing can remain and will be accepted as compliant, which the council strongly advocated for.
Overall, David says it's clear the Government has taken account of many of the points made in the council's submission.
He says the Government was firmly reminded the Taranaki region has, over time, collectively demonstrated strong commitment to improving freshwater health, taking carefully considered long-term action and spending millions of dollars on interventions of proven effectiveness.
"If anything, the original proposals threatened to undo a lot of good work and goodwill and bring hardship and deprivation to communities engaged in productive and sustainable enterprise. We are still working through the amended proposals, but we're encouraged that the voice of reason appears to have been heard, at least in part.
"We all know we have more to do in both our rural and urban areas, but Taranaki people know how to roll up our sleeves and keep moving forward – we've consistently led and shown New Zealand that it is not about endlessly changing plans, policies, meetings and paper – it's on the ground actions that change and improve our environment."