Like any elder millennial who loves movies, I can recite most of Rob Reiner’s by heart. “I’ll have what she’s having.” “I’m your No 1 fan.” The Princess Bride was the stuff of sleepovers, a tattered VHS tape hanging on for dear life as five to seven excitable girls rewound
The unbearable sadness of the movie Rob Reiner made with his son
Subscribe to listen
Director Rob Reiner and his son Nick Reiner while promoting the film Being Charlie in New York City in 2016. Photo / Getty Images
Nick Reiner co-wrote the screenplay. Rob Reiner directed it. It was about the tormented relationship between a young addict and his famous father.
The movie opens with Charlie, the son, walking out of a desert rehab facility only to steal the first drugs he comes across – an old woman’s prescription oxycodone – within hours. By the time he hitchhikes home to Los Angeles, his parents have already booked him in another programme; there’s a counsellor from the new place waiting in the living room. His mother is a soft touch, but his father, David, is a Hollywood celebrity now running for governor, and the implication is that David would like his son’s problem to be tidied up before the polls open.
Both Rob and Nick made sure to say the movie was fiction. In a joint interview, Nick explained that while all addicts do “unsavoury” things, he hadn’t wanted his particular infractions to be captured on screen. But he acknowledged the story is based on his life and experiences, and many of the contours are the same: relapses, reboots, relapses again. A son who has endless resources but cannot get well. Parents who have endless resources and cannot help their child. “We’ve tried everything. We don’t know what else to do,” Michele reportedly said to a friend a few years ago, a reminder that no amount of money can trump addiction; no fame can outrun it.
Being Charlie is not a very good movie, which makes it all the more of a heartbreaking one. You cannot imagine Rob would have signed on to direct this film if the screenplay were written by anyone other than his son: the characters are flat and one-dimensional, the observations trite. Nearly every review at the time noted that Charlie, the protagonist we were supposed to root for, came across as snotty and cruel.

But Rob’s son did write it, and Rob did sign on, and you can imagine the relief he might have felt launching the project – several months of collaborative creativity during which he was guaranteed to know exactly where Nick was and that his son was safe. His own cinematic version of a rehab programme, when all others had failed.
On Monday, many people were posting quotes from the joint interview I cited above, and after I saw enough quotes, I went and watched the whole thing, and then I read every other interview they did together. They are heartbreaking in retrospect. Everything is heartbreaking, in retrospect. Every interview is Rob Reiner trying to lift up his son. Every interview is Rob calling Nick “brilliant” and “talented”, insisting that working on the movie was the most fulfilling creative experience he ever had, that he would work with son again “in a heartbeat”.
A critic from the Chicago Sun-Times, in one of the gentler reviews, speculated that Being Charlie would be “better remembered as the vehicle to healing for the family than a movie that made an impact”.
This is a tricky column for me to write because we still don’t know for sure what happened in that house Sunday. Or in that family, or in that relationship. Court proceedings are just beginning to unspool.
But I watched these interviews, and I watched that movie from the perspective of a parent. A parent of a much younger child, to be sure, but a parent nonetheless. My daughter is just getting to the age where she asks for privacy, sometimes, where her world is getting bigger than my husband and me. I have no idea what Rob and Michele went through, but I can fathom what it would feel like to be watching your baby, biting your tongue, biding your time, knowing their mistakes will be theirs to make and yours to helplessly observe, and then to fix if at all you can. Every parent knows this feeling.
In the last scene of Being Charlie, David discovers Charlie in the kitchen of the family beach house, where he had fled the night before. He asks if he can sit, and Charlie indifferently says, “It’s your house”. David tries to make conversation, and it doesn’t go well. Finally, he starts apologising. For trusting the psychologists who said that Charlie needed tough love more than total acceptance. For pushing Charlie into rehab after rehab. David tells Charlie he loves him. He tells him: “I’d rather have you alive and hating me than dead on the street. What do you want me to do? Tell me what to do.”

“I don’t hate you. I don’t,” Charlie tells his father a few minutes later, and David is moved to tears by this faint praise, reaching for his son with the desperation of a drowning man.
Through this scene you can’t stop looking at David, who has watched his son fall apart countless times. Who has been unable to put him back together. Who would do anything he could, anything at all, including taking the blame, including making apologies that aren’t his to make, including knowing that his son might be fine tomorrow, or he might be back on the streets, or he might be dead. Or he might be something else. Some horrible, horrible fate that neither of them can begin to imagine.
“What do you want me to do?” he begs his beautiful, broken, afflicted, struggling son. “Tell me what to do.”
As you wish. Jesus Christ, what this family went through. As you wish, as you wish.
Sign up to Herald Premium Editor’s Picks, delivered straight to your inbox every Friday. Editor-in-Chief Murray Kirkness picks the week’s best features, interviews and investigations. Sign up for Herald Premium here.