One of the most striking recent examples is Zero Dark Thirty, Kathryn Bigelow's dramatisation of of the United States government's hunt for and killing of al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden. US forces killed bin Laden on May 2, 2011.
The movie hit theatres in December 2012, barely a year and a half later.
That's a remarkable turnaround time. Bigelow, though, was no stranger to tackling fresh issues. She won six Oscars, including best director and best picture, for her 2008 movie The Hurt Locker, which followed a US bomb disposal team during the Iraq War.
Though the movie was based on accounts of a journalist embedded in Iraq in 2004, it came out while the Iraq War was ongoing.
The 2013 Boston marathon bombing, which killed three and injured hundreds more, was turned into two major, star-driven films.
First came Patriots Day in 2016. The Peter Berg movie depicts Mark Wahlberg as policeman Tommy Saunders as he searches for the bombers in the attack's immediate aftermath.
Though movies based on recent tragedies are often subject to backlash, the reaction to Patriots Day was particularly fierce - especially in the Boston area. The movie, wrote Boston film critic Sean Burns, was "as disgraceful an exploitation of real-life tragedy as I've ever seen. Everyone involved in this movie should be ashamed of themselves."
The Boston Globe's Ty Burr was slightly more forgiving, calling it "slickly heartfelt" and "vaguely insulting".
A year later, Stronger hit theatres. Rather than focus on police, David Gordon Green told the story of Jeff Bauman (played by Jake Gyllenhaal), a man who lost his legs in the bombing and was the subject of a famous photo from the day.
This one was much more warmly received, perhaps because it was based on Bauman's memoir. It "rises on the power of its well-chosen ensemble to offer an emotionally resonant fact-based story that transcends inspirational drama cliches," reads the critical consensus on Rotten Tomatoes, where it earned a 92 per cent "fresh" rating.
The September 11, 2001, terrorist attack on the United States was, by far, the country's deadliest. Perhaps due to this wretched gravity, Hollywood waited a bit longer to cash in on the horror. But cash in it did, with a pair of back-to-back movies. United 93 and World Trade Center were both released in 2006, within four months of each other.
The first came in April, and as the title suggests, told the story of United 93 - the hijacked plane heading toward Washington, DC, that crashed in Pennsylvania after its passengers attacked the hijackers. Paul Greengrass' account was met warmly by critics, but those connected to the actual event weren't as pleased.
"It was both excruciating and beautiful at the same time," Alice Hoagland, whose son was on the flight, told the San Francisco Chronicle. After Marjorie Kase, who lost three friends in the 9/11 attacks, unexpectedly saw a trailer, she echoed others in telling the paper, "I don't think the country is ready for this movie right now. We don't have enough perspective or hindsight on the matter."
Just as United 93 was coming out on DVD months later, Oliver Stone's account of first responders was hitting theatres amid far more mixed reviews - many of which deemed it exploitative.
The World Trade Centre attacks are still being mined for the big screen. 9/11, starring Charlie Sheen and Whoopi Goldberg, came out just last year.
With each release, it seems, those directly affected by attacks are forced to relieve the horrid day.
Bill Doyle, whose son was killed in the Twin Towers, was particularly angry after seeing advertisements for 2012's Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close, the Tom Hanks vehicle based on a Jonathan Safran Foer novel.
"Everybody's trying to make money off 9/11," he told the New York Post.
"A lot of families got upset. Why couldn't they warn us about this? I don't think people really realised that these people are really still stressed."
