Yet, despite its obvious flaws, I think the show can only improve from here.
As season four returns, the core group of survivors have been scattered far and wide, with small groups of two and three replacing the large congregation who had gathered at the now-destroyed prison.
It's a move that will force the writers to develop major characters like Michonne and Daryl, whether they want to or not.
There are new characters coming into play too, including Michael Cudlitz (Southland) as comic fan favourite Abraham Ford, and a rather large herd of zombies bearing down on the area in which our survivors toil - even though the number of zombie attacks might continue to drop.
I don't mind, though. The show, like Kirkman's comic book on which it's based, was never really about zombies anyway.
Core characters Rick and Carl could develop some more as they deal with the death (or perceived death, depending on how you viewed the mid-season finale) of baby Judith.
Andrew Lincoln has a decent acting range and, if the writers are smart, they'll try to get him using some of that talent.
So, should you watch the second half of The Walking Dead's fourth season? If you've enjoyed the show at any stage, I think the answer is an unequivocal yes - the mid-season finale was the best episode in a while, and I think showrunner Scott Gimple knows where he is taking the show now that some of the poor story decisions he inherited (The Governor, the prison) have been swept aside.
The Walking Dead will almost certainly get better in this final eight episodes. I'll be tuning in. I reckon you should too.
* The Walking Dead, TV2, 9.30pm
Read more: Why I'm bailing on The Walking Dead