"It's puzzling why they're putting so much energy into fighting the disclosure of her finances but I'm not deterred. We will get there eventually, it's just a question of how much they want to cost themselves creating speed bumps on the road to the ultimate destination."
The order comes two weeks after the lawyer filed documents that accused Britney of trying to use her celebrity status to avoid complying with court procedures.
Kaplan wrote in legal paperwork: "The California Superior Court is not the Coachella Music Festival, there are no front of the line VIP passes"
He also stressed the court wants to do what is best for the children, not for the "extraordinarily wealthy parents".
In the documents, the dancer's lawyer claimed Britney had failed to sit for a deposition, refused to provide any records and stressed they have received "NOT A SINGLE DOCUMENT" from her team.
He also teased that rules must be "different in the Rich and Famous edition of the California Family Code."
However, the Womanizer singer's own lawyer, Laura Wasser, successfully argued the "overly broad" discovery requests were a form of harassment and noted that though the former couple - who were was married for four years until 2007 - share equal custody, Britney has always paid her ex-husband on time and generally funds her sons' activities and lifestyle anyway.