Before Silicon Valley Bank failed, First Republic had a banking franchise that was the envy of most of the industry. Its clients — mostly the rich and powerful — rarely defaulted on their loans. The 72-branch bank has made much of its money making low-cost loans to the wealthy, which reportedly included Meta Platforms chief executive Mark Zuckerberg.
Flush with deposits from the well-heeled, First Republic saw total assets more than double from US$102b at the end of 2019′s first quarter, when its full-time workforce was 4600.
But the vast majority of its deposits, like those in Silicon Valley and Signature Bank, were uninsured — that is, above the US$250,000 limit set by the FDIC. And that worried analysts and investors. If First Republic were to fail, its depositors might not get all their money back.
Those fears were crystallised in the bank’s recent quarterly results. The bank said depositors pulled more than US$100b out of the bank during April’s crisis. First Republic said it was only able to stanch the bleeding after a group of large banks stepped in to save it with US$30b in uninsured deposits.
Since the crisis, First Republic has been looking for a way to quickly turn itself around. The bank planned to sell off unprofitable assets, including the low-interest mortgages it provided to wealthy clients. It also announced plans to lay off up to a quarter of its workforce, which totalled about 7200 employees late last year.
Investors remained sceptical. The bank’s executives have taken no questions from investors or analysts since the bank reported its results, causing First Republic’s stock to sink further.
And it’s hard to profitably restructure a balance sheet when a firm has to sell off assets quickly and has fewer bankers to find opportunities for the bank to invest in. It took years for banks like Citigroup and Bank of America to return to profitability after the Global Financial Crisis 15 years ago, and those banks had the benefit of a government-aided backstop to keep them going.