"OMV says that it is entitled to have its 'untenantable' claim and the validity of its cancellation of the lease determined by an arbitrator under a provision in the lease and to have Precinct's claim to recover rent stayed until that has occurred," the decision said.
"Precinct says that the purported cancellation of the lease was invalid and that OMV remains liable for rent from at least the date on which it could have re-occupied the premises," the decision said, noting that was at March 13 this year.
"It says that the arbitration clause in the lease does not apply to a claim by the lessor for rent and that there is accordingly no issue that must be referred to arbitration under the arbitration clause," the judge wrote.
The least started in 2009, was renewed in 2012 and 2015 and is not now due to expire till November 30, 2020. Precinct has asked for a declaration that the premises have not been rendered untenantable and it wants costs.
Precinct wants $258,243.36 unpaid rent, allegedly due on March 13, the decision said.
The matter is due to return to court to be heard on Monday.
"OMV's application for a stay of the proceeding is dismissed. Precinct's application for summary judgment remains to be heard at 10 am on 4 December," the judge said.