ASIC alleges Drake used his position to gain an advantage for himself and the former directors for failing to act with the proper degree of care on transactions involving the
LM Managed Performance Fund (MPF).
ASIC said that MPF loaned funds to Maddison Estate Pty - a company Drake directed - for property development on the Gold Coast known as 'Maddison Estate'.
According to ASIC:
* Between 2008 and 2012, through numerous loans using MPF funds, Maddison's loan limit was increased from $40 million to $280 million. By the time LMIM entered into administration, and although a development approval had been procured and some preliminary land clearing had taken place, no construction work had commenced on the development, no plans of subdivision had been registered and none of the proposed housing lots had been sold.
* Loan extensions in 2011 and 2012 were approved by the directors in the absence of independent valuations or feasibility studies. ASIC alleges decisions taken by Drake and the former directors to vary and extend Maddison's loan from $115 million to $180 million in September 2011, and from $180 million to $280 million in August 2012, were not decisions which the directors of a trustee in the position of LMIM should have taken.
* ASIC also alleges that a $9.8 million 'loan re-establishment fee', payable to LMIM as trustee of MPF, which was extended to Maddison Estate Pty as part of the 2012 loan extension, was levied to ensure that the LM group of companies (principally controlled or owned by Drake) could book a financial year profit.