• Trees required trimming;
• A leak in the living area;
• Water damage to the carpet;
• The garage was full of a previous tenant's rubbish;
• Rubbish needed clearing from the back of the property;
• Locks on the sliding door did not work and needed replacement;
• The oven did not work;
• There was no main heating source;
• One of the power points in the lounge was sparking;
• The garage door did not open;
• The deck was unsafe.
However, by October 2019, the landlords had failed to make adequate repairs, forcing Cleghorn to apply to the Tenancy Tribunal for work orders and compensation on October 10.
Four days later, the landlords issued Cleghorn a 90-day termination notice. On December 10, 2019, the tribunal issued an interim order to put the notice on hold.Two days later, the landlords issued a notice increasing Cleghorn's rent from $300 a week to $400, effective February 12.
The tribunal found the 90-day notice was retaliatory, and said the landlords had committed an unlawful act.
"The landlord was motivated, if not entirely, at least in part by the tenant filing her application in the Tribunal."
The tribunal also found the 33 per cent increase in rent was designed to "induce the tenant to terminate the tenancy by notice".
Jian Li and Chunyan Ren were ordered to pay $1350 in exemplary damages relating to the quality of existing insulation; and $1500 in exemplary damages for issuing the retaliatory notice.