UDC Finance's deposits shrank in the latest financial year as the question mark hanging over Australia & New Zealand Banking Group's ownership of the country's biggest finance company saw a reduction in investments by external advisers.
The Auckland-based non-bank deposit taker's debenture funding shrank to $1.59 billion as at September 30 from $1.74b a year earlier, reducing its share of deposits among finance companies to 57 per cent from 61 per cent a year earlier. At the same time, UDC's loan book expanded 9.6 per cent to $2.57b, helping generate a record profit of $58.3 million.
The finance company funded that credit growth by increasing its use of a $1b facility with parent ANZ, drawing down $595m as at September 30 from $280m a year earlier.
ANZ has been reviewing its ownership of the finance company this year, which triggered Standard & Poor's to downgrade UDC's credit rating to A- from AA-. NZX-listed Heartland Bank has indicated an interest in buying UDC, though the Australian Financial Review's Street Talk column last week reported ANZ was likely to announce a sale to China's HNA Group before its annual meeting on Friday.
"UDC remains an attractive and secure place to invest with a S&P rating of A-, but while there's a strategic review being conducted about UDC Finance there has been a decline in investments from external advisors," an ANZ spokesman said in an emailed statement. "Reinvestment from direct investors remains high."
The finance company holds the highest credit rating among its deposit-taking peers, with Liberty the only other NBDT with an investment grade rating at BBB. UDC is currently offering 3.6 per cent for a 12-month term deposit, sitting in the middle of the pack among other finance companies. However, longer duration terms are largely lower than UDC's peers.
UDC lifted debenture stock at call or within three months to $632m as at September 30 from $604.3m a year earlier, while facing declines across longer terms.
Finance companies fell out of favour among investors after the collapse of the sector last decade, when an over-exposure to leveraged property development and a propensity for related-party lending triggered a domino effect among mezzanine lenders. Tighter regulation followed the collapse, which saw a clean-out of the sector, leaving a handful of firms willing to meet the requirements to keep taking deposits from the public.