"Design-build projects also generally build in flexibility for future expansion, either upwards through increasing the height of the warehouse racking system or outwards by designing external walls that can be easily removed," says Church.
"However, they do require a tenant to lock into a long-term lease and they also involve a greater degree of forward planning. For example, we have a tenant at the moment wanting to move into a large amount of space by Christmas, so design build is obviously not an option for them."
Jamsheed Sidhwa, a supply-chain industrial property specialist with Bayleys Manukau, says larger tenants looking to reposition their businesses are increasingly faced with the option of either having to refurbish existing buildings or design-build to their needs. In one recent lease he negotiated, it will take nearly six months of modifications for a relatively new building to become operationally compatible with the tenant's requirements.
"While new warehouses typically have a 10- to 12-month development timeframe, the design-build process means ending up with a building that meets the client's needs in every conceivable way. However, when it comes to modifying an existing building the old adage that 'it is difficult to put square pegs in round holes' invariably applies to a certain extent."
Sidhwa says in a 6500sq m lease he concluded on a road front greenfield site in Wiri early this year, a comprehensive evaluation showed existing premises would not have optimised the tenant's business operation and design-build came though as the preferred option.
"Starting with a blank building canvas gives the ability to build in operational solutions from the ground up for every aspect of the client's business to enable it to perform better. "Organisations that go down the design-build track typically report improvements in supply-chain efficiencies, day-to-day operations management, client interface, environmental efficiencies and overall staff morale."