None of this is illegal. And therefore, determining what a "fair share" should be, is open to a great deal of debate.
But the inference in the paradise papers is not about legality, it's about morality.
Which brings us back to a company that has people in lines outside their shops. Which ultimately is how this thing gets solved, if it ever does. Does anyone care? Do the people in the lines with their $2000 for the iPhone X feel aggrieved and ripped off by Apple? Do they feel any sense of unfairness towards the company they're about to unload yet more of their money to?
Because that's the tech and phone industry isn't it. New model after new model, the never ending desire to be cool, to be seen to be cool to have the latest thing. Part of Apple's brand is about being cool.
So this one of those stories where everyone tuts tuts. Headline writers revel in the ability to whack the Queen, Bono, and Apple into a headline to isolate them as ultra-rich, money-grubbing currency shufflers, hoping for some form of moral outrage, only to be met with a ho hum sort of response.
What do you reckon it would be ? The poll, 100 people in an apple queue, how many would care I reckon less than 50. How many would be aggrieved enough to not buy a phone? I reckon no-one. And in that, is the real weight of the story. In theory, it's an outrageous scandal. In reality, it's fish and chip wrapper.